ghl_calendar_service_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false. The description adds OAuth scope 'calendars.write' and endpoint details, which are useful but not essential. No behavior beyond annotations is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is four lines and mostly concise. Redundancy exists: the first line 'Create Service' duplicates the annotation title. Front-loading is decent with the core purpose first.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks context about what creating a service entails, e.g., that it adds to the catalog or how it relates to other calendar entities. Schema has full coverage, but no output schema. Minimal completeness for a mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% documented parameter descriptions. The tool description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title 'Create Service' and description 'Create new service in a location' clearly state the verb and resource. However, among sibling tools like ghl_calendar_service_list and ghl_calendar_service_booking_create, this tool is not distinguished from other service-related actions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides OAuth scopes and endpoint but no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like ghl_calendar_service_update or ghl_calendar_service_booking_create. No when-not-to-use or prerequisite information is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.