Skip to main content
Glama
zackscriven

ghl-mcp-server-v2

by zackscriven

ghl_saas_bulk_disable_deprecated

Disable SaaS for multiple locations in GoHighLevel using an agency-level token. Provide company ID and location IDs.

Instructions

DEPRECATED per spec — superseded by POST /saas/bulk-disable-saas/{companyId}. REQUIRES AN AGENCY-LEVEL (Company) TOKEN. [DEPRECATED per official docs — prefer the documented replacement if one exists.] Disable SaaS for locations Disable SaaS for locations for given locationIds Endpoint: POST /saas-api/public-api/bulk-disable-saas/{companyId} (Version header: v3; source: v3/saas-v3.json)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bodyYesRequest body (schema carried verbatim from the official OpenAPI spec).
companyIdYesCompany ID to disable SaaS for
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false. The description adds the deprecation status and auth requirement (agency-level token). No contradiction detected.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is verbose and repetitive, stating deprecation multiple times and mixing endpoint details with prose. Could be streamlined into a concise sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

As a deprecated tool, the description covers replacement and required token. However, it lacks details on side effects, reversibility, and return values (no output schema). Adequate but incomplete for full operational context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear descriptions. The description adds minimal value by mentioning locationIds in the context of disabling, but does not elaborate on format or constraints beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it disables SaaS for locations and explicitly marks the tool as deprecated with a superseding endpoint. The purpose is specific and distinguishes from siblings via deprecation note.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance: deprecated, superseded by another endpoint, and requires an agency-level token. This tells the agent when not to use it and what alternative to prefer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/zackscriven/ghl-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server