ghl_product_store_set_inclusion

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false, so it's a write operation. The description aligns with this but does not disclose side effects, idempotency, or behavior on existing state. Given annotations are present, the description adds endpoint and scopes but no deeper behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and front-loaded with the key action. It contains a slight redundancy ('Action to include/exclude the product in store' repeats the first sentence) but overall is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter tool with an object body, the description provides the main purpose and endpoint. It does not explain the body structure (covered by schema) or return values. Given no output schema, it is adequate but could include a usage example or note on error conditions.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description does not add significant meaning beyond what is in the schema (e.g., it repeats action enum but does not explain altId, altType, or productIds further). Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: includes or excludes a product from a store's storefront listing. It specifies the verb (include/exclude) and the resource (product in store listing), and it distinguishes from sibling tools like product creation or deletion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions the action parameter and OAuth scopes but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., ghl_product_store_set_priority) or when not to use it. The usage context is implied but lacks direct guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.