ghl_product_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-destructive and non-read-only behavior. The description adds OAuth scopes and endpoint details, which are useful but do not disclose other behavioral traits like side effects or reversibility. Context is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively short but contains redundancy (title repeats in first sentence). It could be trimmed without losing information, but it is not overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description does not mention the response format or what the created product object contains, which is important for a creation tool. It also fails to explicitly list required parameters or provide usage tips for the nested schema, leaving gaps in completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all properties, so the description adds no extra parameter meaning beyond generic instructions. Baseline of 3 is appropriate as the schema already provides full parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'adding a new product to the system', which clearly defines the verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools that handle other product operations (update, delete, list, etc.) by focusing on creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to update instead of create. It only instructs to 'ensure required information is provided', which is generic and not helpful for decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.