ghl_saas_enable_location

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false (mutation) and destructiveHint=false. The description adds no behavioral details beyond 'enable', such as side effects, idempotency, or what enabling entails. It does not contradict annotations but fails to provide meaningful transparency beyond structured data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description includes unnecessary HTML tags and repeated title, making it verbose and messy. The core information (token requirement, plan restriction) is there, but the formatting is distracting. Every sentence should earn its place; the HTML and repetition do not.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a complex nested parameter (body) and no output schema. The description covers token and plan restrictions but omits details about request body structure, locationId semantics, and response format. Given the complexity, this is incomplete for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%, yet the description provides no parameter descriptions. It mentions locationId only via the endpoint path but does not explain its meaning. The nested body object has many fields, but the description offers no guidance on when to use them (e.g., V1 vs V2).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Enable SaaS') and the resource ('Sub-Account (Formerly Location)'), and the endpoint is provided. It distinguishes from sibling tools like bulk enable. However, the title is repeated and HTML formatting adds noise, slightly reducing clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly warns that it requires an agency-level token and is only available on the Agency Pro plan. This provides strong usage context, but it does not explicitly mention when not to use it or compare with alternatives like bulk enable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.