Skip to main content
Glama
Infection Free Zone MCP

Infection Free Zone MCP

by tianq021

get_squads_report

Retrieve a complete squad report with orders, health, cargo, assigned vehicle, trunk load, and fuel in a single call.

Instructions

Squad roster with orders, health, cargo, assigned vehicle, trunk load and fuel in one call.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_squads_report"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.2.2

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses the returned data fields, which is useful behavioral context, but does not state that the operation is read-only, whether it requires a selected squad, or how large the roster response may be.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with no filler. Every listed field earns its place by telling the agent what the report contains.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter read report with no output schema, the description usefully enumerates the returned fields. However, it leaves out when to choose this report and whether the result is scoped to a current squad or all squads, so it is only adequate rather than complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is no parameter semantics to explain. The baseline for a parameterless tool is 4, and no contradiction or missing input is present.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (squad roster) and enumerates the contents returned: orders, health, cargo, vehicle, trunk load, fuel. This clearly distinguishes it from generic reports like get_daily_report, though it does not explicitly name a sibling alternative.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus related reports such as get_colonists_report or get_enemy_report. The phrase 'in one call' weakly implies aggregation, but there are no stated prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.