haops_preview_role_template_cascade

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states 'Read-only — does not mutate', which is a key behavioral trait. However, it does not disclose auth requirements, rate limits, or other potential side effects, which would improve transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the primary action, and no unnecessary words. It efficiently conveys purpose, safety, and usage context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 params, no output schema), the description covers purpose and usage well. However, it lacks detail on the output format (e.g., what kind of list is returned), which would be helpful for a preview tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents both parameters. The description mentions 'named role template' hinting at the 'name' parameter but adds no significant semantic detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: preview which project protocols need rewiring if a role template is bumped via PUT. It specifies the verb 'Preview' and the resource 'project protocols', distinguishing it from sibling tools like haops_update_role_template and haops_preview_skill_cascade.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly advises to use this tool 'BEFORE calling haops_update_role_template({ ..., cascade: true })' to estimate blast radius, providing clear when-to-use guidance. It implies it's for high-impact templates but does not explicitly state when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.