haops_create_doc_section

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses the key behavioral nuance of using slug instead of UUID. However, it does not mention error handling, permissions, or whether the operation is reversible. This is a moderate gap for a creation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, front-loads the purpose, and includes a critical note in 2 sentences. Every sentence is purposeful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema or annotations, the description covers the core function and key identifier nuance. It lacks details on return format or error conditions, but the verbose parameter hint provides some context. Mostly complete for a creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. The description adds value for artifactSlug by explaining its format and usage, but other parameters (title, content, etc.) are already well-documented in the schema. No significant additional meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new section within a documentation artifact,' specifying the verb 'create' and the resource 'doc section'. It distinguishes from siblings like haops_create_doc_artifact by noting the unique identifier type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states that artifactSlug uses kebab-case slug, not UUID, and directs users to haops_list_doc_artifacts for resolution. This provides clear when-to-use and alternative tool guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.