haops_create_skill_pack

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. Discloses preconditions (admin, flag), error behavior (404), field constraints (real UUIDs, not names), default values (isFeatured false, skillIds empty), and return type (created entity). Covers all important behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single paragraph of 4-5 sentences, front-loaded with key constraints. Concise given the complexity of 6 parameters and multiple constraints. Could be more scannable with bullet points but remains efficient without fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Thoroughly covers prerequisites, error behavior, parameter constraints, default values, field relationships, and return value. No output schema exists, but return is described. Complete for correct invocation with no gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (all params have descriptions). Description adds value by clarifying that skillIds are UUIDs NOT names, provides example kebab-case name, and links to API endpoint. Offers context beyond schema, like field relationships and defaults.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the function: 'Create a new skill pack' with specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings by noting that system packs are seeded, not created via API, and lists constraints like admin only and feature flag requirement.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly specifies prerequisites: 'admin only, requires ENABLE_COMPOSED_PROTOCOLS=true on the server' and behavior when flag is off ('returns 404'). Contrasts with system packs seeding, providing context but no explicit exclusion for other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.