HAOps MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to HAOps MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with HacknPlan project management via the MCP protocol. Provides tools for managing projects, work items, boards, milestones, time logs, design models, and cross-project portfolio views.7510 npmMIT
- FlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to manage game development projects on HacknPlan, including tasks, boards, milestones, and GDD documents through natural language.1003-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with System Task projects, teams, and tasks, providing daily briefs, project reports, team load, and risk identification, as well as creating and updating tasks and demands.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to connect to an OpenProject instance and query, search, and manage projects, work packages, users, and time entries through natural language. Supports advanced filtering, pagination, and creation of work packages like epics and user stories.13MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to automate project management on DutyHub, including tasks, sprints, and comments.16-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for hae — a GTD-based task management app. Gives Claude full access to your hae instance: projects, cards, columns, checklists, comments, labels, organisations, notifications, users, and AI features.28 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 137 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes with clear descriptions, but there is some overlap (e.g., multiple 'claim' tools, bulk vs individual skill updates). The descriptions help differentiate, but the sheer number may still cause confusion.
All tools follow a consistent 'haops_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., haops_list_issues, haops_create_feature). Naming is uniform and predictable across the entire set.
With 137 tools, the surface area is extremely large. While it reflects a comprehensive system, it likely includes many rarely used tools and can overwhelm agents. A more focused set would be preferable.
The tool set covers a wide range of domains (project management, git, helpdesk, documentation, skills, protocols, memory). There are minor gaps (e.g., missing some lifecycle transitions), but overall it is quite complete for the stated purpose.