get_warning_rule_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully convey behavioral traits. It states 'query' (read operation) but does not disclose error handling, authentication needs, or what happens if the ID is not found. The minimal description leaves significant behavioral gaps for the agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose. It is front-loaded with no extraneous words, earning its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity (1 parameter, no output schema) and missing annotations, the description is minimally adequate. It covers the basic purpose but lacks behavioral context like error responses or prerequisites. For a simple retrieval tool, it is barely sufficient but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the 'id' parameter already described as '规则ID' (rule ID). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; it simply restates 'by ID'. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema carries the weight.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'query detailed information of a single warning rule by ID'. It uses a specific verb (query) and resource (warning rule), distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_warning_rules which lists all rules, and get_warning_by_id which retrieves warnings, not rules.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly provide when to use this tool versus alternatives. It implies usage for single rule retrieval but offers no guidance on when not to use it or comparisons with siblings like get_warning_rules. This is adequate but lacks explicit direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.