create_warning

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full burden. It only states 'create' with no details on side effects (e.g., whether it triggers notifications), required permissions, or system behavior. The description is insufficient for behavioral understanding.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence with zero waste. It is appropriately sized for a simple creation tool, though it lacks front-loaded key details like required parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 12 parameters, 2 required, and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It omits important context such as what happens after creation, error handling, or how it relates to other warning tools like 'get_warnings'.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with each parameter having a Chinese description. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema already documents parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: '创建新的报警记录' (create a new alarm record). It uses a specific verb 'create' and resource 'alarm record', making it distinct from sibling tools like 'create_warning_clean'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With 12 sibling tools including 'acknowledge_alarm', 'batch_confirm_warnings', and 'resolve_alarm', the description fails to differentiate usage contexts or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.