delete_warning_rule
Delete a warning rule by providing its ID, removing the rule from the IoT platform's alarm management system.
Instructions
删除报警规则
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 规则ID |
Delete a warning rule by providing its ID, removing the rule from the IoT platform's alarm management system.
删除报警规则
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 规则ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only states the action. It fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as irreversibility, cascading effects, or authentication requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise—a single phrase with no superfluous words. However, it lacks any structure or supplementary details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (1 param, no output schema), the description is still insufficient. It omits context about why you would delete a rule, what happens after deletion, and how it relates to other tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (the id parameter is documented). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description '删除报警规则' (delete alarm rule) clearly states a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like delete_warning and delete_warning_clean, which operate on different entities.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many delete tools available, the agent has no information on context or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sshwsfc/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server