Skip to main content
Glama
sshwsfc

AIRIOT MCP Server

by sshwsfc
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to AIRIOT MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • bika-mcp

      hamchowderr
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for integrating with Bika.ai platform, enabling AI assistants to perform CRUD operations on databases, manage attachments, and utilize automation and webhooks.
      1
      MIT

    • mcp-server-thingpark

      tookta91
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage LoRaWAN devices on Actility ThingPark, allowing device listing, details, and downlink command sending via natural language.
      MIT

    • plc-mcp-server

      OlubunmiAde
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for industrial PLC integration, enabling AI to read tags, monitor alarms, and interact with Allen-Bradley ControlLogix PLCs via natural language.
      9
      MIT

    • Metabase MCP Plus

      schachan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to query databases, execute SQL, and manage Metabase resources like dashboards, cards, and collections through natural language.
      22
      MIT

    • ignition-mcp

      jsgorana
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for Inductive Automation Ignition, enabling AI assistants to browse and write tags, query history and alarms, manage projects, and deploy Perspective views through natural language.
      43
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 60 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes, especially around alarms/warnings with both deprecated and current tools (e.g., acknowledge_alarm vs update_warning). Numerous similar warning-related tools (get_warnings, get_latest_warnings, get_archived_warnings) can confuse an agent on which to use.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case. However, there are minor inconsistencies: use of 'alarm' in deprecated tools vs 'warning' in current ones, and singular/plural variations (e.g., archive_all_warnings vs restore_archived_warning).

    Tool Count2/5

    With 60 tools, the server covers a very broad scope (user management, tables, reports, warnings, files, device control) making it unwieldy. The number is excessive for a typical MCP server, leading to tool selection challenges.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive CRUD and lifecycle operations for tables, records, reports, and warnings, plus additional features like archiving, statistics, and device control. Only minor gaps exist due to the presence of deprecated tools, but functionally the surface is complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources