create_report
Generates a new report with required name and type, plus optional description and configuration.
Instructions
创建新报表
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | 报表名称 | |
| description | No | 报表描述 | |
| type | Yes | 报表类型 | |
| config | No | 报表配置 |
Generates a new report with required name and type, plus optional description and configuration.
创建新报表
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | 报表名称 | |
| description | No | 报表描述 | |
| type | Yes | 报表类型 | |
| config | No | 报表配置 |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description provides no behavioral context such as side effects, permissions, or return value. It simply states 'create new report'.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (one phrase) but is under-specified. It fails to provide essential context and is more of a tautology than a helpful description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has 4 parameters, 2 required, nested objects, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate. It does not explain what happens on creation, response structure, or prerequisites.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
All 4 parameters have descriptions in the schema (100% coverage), so the description does not need to add much. However, the description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description '创建新报表' restates the tool name 'create_report' without additional specificity. It does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'update_report' or 'execute_report'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidance is provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create_record' or 'update_report'.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sshwsfc/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server