execute_report
Execute a report by providing its ID and optional parameters to retrieve the report data.
Instructions
执行报表生成,返回报表数据
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 报表ID | |
| parameters | No | 报表参数(可选) |
Execute a report by providing its ID and optional parameters to retrieve the report data.
执行报表生成,返回报表数据
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 报表ID | |
| parameters | No | 报表参数(可选) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral traits. It only states 'execute and return data', omitting details like synchronization, side effects, permissions, or state changes. This is insufficient for a mutation-like operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short at one sentence, which is concise. However, it could be slightly expanded to add context without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, so the description should explain return data structure. It does not. Also, the tool's complexity (parameters, execution) is not adequately addressed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for id and parameters. The description does not add further meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'execute report generation, return report data', which specifies the action and result. It differentiates from sibling tools like create_report or get_report_by_id.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as prerequisites or context after creating a report. The description is a single phrase without any usage direction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sshwsfc/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server