execute_warning_clean
Trigger immediate execution of a warning cleanup rule by ID to remove resolved alarms and maintain system accuracy.
Instructions
立即执行清除规则
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 清除规则ID |
Trigger immediate execution of a warning cleanup rule by ID to remove resolved alarms and maintain system accuracy.
立即执行清除规则
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 清除规则ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description does not disclose that executing a clean rule is likely destructive (mutates data). No mention of side effects, permissions, or rate limits. The burden falls entirely on the description, which fails to provide transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence). While concise, it lacks necessary detail, making it under-specified rather than efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no annotations, output schema, and only one parameter, the description should explain execution behavior, return value, and side effects. It does not, leaving the tool's context incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (the only parameter 'id' is described as '清除规则ID'). The description does not add any additional semantic meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline score of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description '立即执行清除规则' clearly indicates the action: execute a cleaning rule. The verb 'execute' and resource 'clearing rule' are clear. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create/delete/update_warning_clean.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, context, or when not to use it. With no annotations, an agent lacks usage direction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sshwsfc/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server