get_warning_by_id
Retrieve detailed information about a specific alarm by providing its unique ID. Quickly access alarm data for monitoring and analysis.
Instructions
根据ID查询单个报警的详细信息
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 报警ID |
Retrieve detailed information about a specific alarm by providing its unique ID. Quickly access alarm data for monitoring and analysis.
根据ID查询单个报警的详细信息
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | 报警ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, side effects, or required permissions. It only states the action, leaving important context unclear.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words, making it highly concise and front-loaded with the key purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple ID lookup tool, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks details about the return format or error handling, and given the presence of similar sibling tools, more context would improve completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% coverage, and the description adds no extra meaning beyond the parameter name and type. The baseline of 3 is appropriate as the schema already documents the parameter adequately.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves detailed information of a single alarm by ID, which is a specific verb+resource. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'get_alarm_by_id', which likely serves a similar purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_warnings' or 'get_alarm_by_id'. The description provides no context for appropriate usage scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sshwsfc/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server