get_table_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states it queries details, but does not disclose whether it is read-only, what happens if ID is not found, or any other behavioral traits. For a simple read operation, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence in Chinese that conveys the tool's purpose with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and efficiently communicates the key action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description does not specify what 'detailed information' includes (e.g., fields returned). For a tool with one parameter and low complexity, it is minimally complete but could be more informative about the return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (parameter 'id' described as '表ID'). The description adds 'by ID' context but does not provide additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline of 3 applies since schema covers the parameter adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the purpose: querying detailed information of a single data table by ID. It uses a specific verb (查询) and resource (数据表), and the method (by ID) distinguishes it from siblings like get_tables (list all) or get_table_records.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you need details of one specific table by ID, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_tables for listing, get_table_records for records). No when-not-to-use or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.