Update Recorder Settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false (write operation) and destructiveHint=false, which the description matches by saying 'update'. However, the description adds no behavioral details beyond annotations—no mention of permissions, rate limits, or side effects. For a mutation tool with no annotation contradictions, this is minimal added value.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with an important constraint, front-loading the purpose. Every part earns its place; no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 11 parameters including nested objects and an output schema present, the description is adequate but could mention that existing settings are updated or that omitted fields remain unchanged. It doesn't explain return values, but the output schema covers that. Lacks some context for a complex mutation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds a high-level grouping ('branding, capture options, etc.') but no further meaning beyond what the schema already provides for each parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update', the resource 'recorder', and the scope 'configuration settings (branding, capture options, etc.)'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_recorder, delete_recorder, and update_recorder_questions by specifying this is for settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description only provides a constraint ('name must always be supplied') but no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_recorder_questions. No context on prerequisites or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.