Create Folder View

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate the tool is not read-only (readOnlyHint=false) and not destructive (destructiveHint=false), but the description adds no behavioral context beyond what's in annotations. It does not disclose potential side effects, permissions needed, or limitations (e.g., naming conflicts).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no extraneous words. It is front-loaded with the key action and resource, making it easy for an AI agent to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (4 parameters, with a nested array in 'columns'), the description is somewhat minimal. It omits the isDefault parameter and does not explain the return value, though an output schema exists. Additional context about view creation implications would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, with each parameter clearly documented (name, columns, folderId, isDefault). The description adds marginal value by mentioning 'custom set of display columns' but does not provide additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create'), the resource ('a new saved view'), and the context ('for a folder with a custom set of display columns'). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like clone_folder_view (which duplicates an existing view) and get_folder_views (which lists views).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool should be used when the user wants to create a new view, but it lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., clone_folder_view). No prerequisites (e.g., folder existence) or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.