Bulk Update Automation Status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare the tool as non-destructive, idempotent, and not read-only, so the description adds minimal behavioral context beyond summarizing the action. It does not discuss side effects, permissions, or rate limits, but the annotations cover the safety profile adequately.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no unnecessary words. Every word is essential and directly conveys the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 parameters, clear schema, and annotations), the description is complete enough. It does not explain return values, but an output schema exists. It could mention that all specified automations are updated simultaneously, but the schema implies this.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, explaining both parameters clearly. The description adds no additional meaning beyond restating the function, which is sufficient but not extra.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (activate or deactivate), the resource (automations), and the scope (multiple at once). It distinguishes from the sibling tool 'toggle_automation_status', which operates on a single automation, by explicitly indicating bulk operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this tool is for bulk operations, contrasting with the sibling 'toggle_automation_status' for single automations. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives or provide any prerequisites or constraints.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.