Retry AI Question

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With annotations all false (no readOnly, destructive, etc.), the description fails to disclose key behaviors like whether the retry is idempotent, whether it creates a new message or modifies existing, or what side effects occur. The description adds no behavioral context beyond the basic retry action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exceedingly concise at two sentences, with the first sentence front-loading the core purpose. Every word serves a function; no redundancy or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (2 required params) and presence of an output schema, the description is adequate but assumes prior knowledge of 'Magic Prompt' and doesn't explain what constitutes a failed/incomplete response. It could be more self-contained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both promptId and messageId. The tool description does not add meaning beyond the schema; it merely references 'previous ask_magic_prompt call' without detailing the parameter roles. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retries a failed or incomplete Magic Prompt response, differentiating it from the sibling ask_magic_prompt by explicitly referencing a previous call. The verb 'retry' and resource are specific, though 'Magic Prompt response' could be more precise.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear condition for use: when a previous ask_magic_prompt call returned an error or incomplete answer. It does not mention when not to use it, but the context is sufficient and no alternative retry tool exists among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.