Get Task
freeagent_get_taskRetrieve a specific task from FreeAgent by its ID to access task details.
Instructions
Get a specific task by ID from FreeAgent.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| task_id | Yes | The ID of the task to retrieve |
freeagent_get_taskRetrieve a specific task from FreeAgent by its ID to access task details.
Get a specific task by ID from FreeAgent.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| task_id | Yes | The ID of the task to retrieve |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior. It only states 'Get a task', but does not indicate that the operation is read-only, idempotent, or what the response format is.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is one sentence, 9 words, front-loaded with the essential information. No unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimal but adequate. It does not describe return values or error responses, but is sufficient for basic use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter, and the tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (get), the resource (task), and the method of identification (by ID). It distinguishes from sibling tools like freeagent_list_tasks or other get_* tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., list_tasks). No prerequisites or conditions are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/samaxbytez/freeagent-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server