get_tag

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description only states 'Get full detail' which implies a read operation but does not explicitly disclose behavioral traits like idempotence, side effects, permissions, or rate limits. The description carries the full burden but adds minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with no superfluous words. It uses a clear structure: a single sentence for purpose followed by a terse bullet list of arguments. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get-by-ID tool with an output schema, the description is minimally sufficient. However, it lacks any mention of preconditions (e.g., tag must exist), error scenarios, or how the returned 'full detail' relates to the output schema. The context is somewhat incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds value beyond the schema by noting that 'tag_id' is numeric (schema says string) and 'account_id' auto-resolves if omitted. However, it does not fully compensate for the 0% schema description coverage, missing details on valid values or format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get full detail for one tag.', specifying the verb 'get' and the resource 'tag' with scope 'one'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like list_tags (list all), create_tag, update_tag, and delete_tag.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_tags for retrieving all tags. The description simply describes the action without usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.