create_notification

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral traits. It does not disclose side effects (e.g., overwriting behavior), required permissions, idempotency, or limits on rule creation. This omission leaves significant uncertainty.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured with an Args section and bullet-point-like formatting, making it readable. It is appropriately sized for the parameter count, though a slightly more terse summary could improve conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (12 parameters, no annotations) and the existence of an output schema, the description covers parameter semantics well but lacks usage guidelines and behavioral transparency. It meets minimal completeness but has clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds substantial meaning beyond the schema, which has 0% coverage. It explains each parameter's purpose, lists common values for alert_type, clarifies optional scope filters, channel toggles, trigger toggles, override email, and auto-resolution of account_id. This is critical for correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a notification rule (who gets pinged on which event),' providing a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like update_notification, delete_notification, and list_notifications.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as update_notification or delete_notification. It lacks explicit context for conditions, prerequisites, or when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.