batch_gramene_homologs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the burden. It discloses that the homology_type filter is shared across all loci and describes the return format as 'standard batch envelope (count + results dict + errors dict)'. This provides useful behavioral context beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two sentences, each containing essential information. No extraneous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and sibling tools, the description covers the key aspects: batch nature, limits, filter sharing, and return envelope. It is complete enough for an agent to use correctly, though it could mention error handling or prerequisites.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50% (only loci has a description). The description adds that the homology_type filter is shared across loci, which is not in the schema. This compensates partially, but more detail on the loci format or homology_type options would further help.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is the 'Batch version of gramene_homologs', specifying the verb (batch query), resource (homologs), and key differentiators (up to 50 loci, shared homology_type filter). It stands out from its sibling 'gramene_homologs' by being batch-oriented.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for batch queries of multiple loci via the 'Batch version' phrasing and the 'up to 50 loci' constraint. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use or provide alternatives beyond the reference to 'gramene_homologs'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.