Update the deal funnel status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states a simple update operation but does not reveal if the action is destructive, if permissions are required, or what happens to the previous status. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short but at the cost of completeness. It is front-loaded with method and path but lacks essential explanatory content. Every sentence does not earn its place because critical information is missing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity (2 parameters, nested objects) and absence of output schema and annotations, the description fails to provide adequate context. It does not explain the purpose of statusId, the effect of the update, or format expectations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description adds no meaning beyond the schema. It merely mentions 'Body: application/json' without explaining the required fields (e.g., statusId) or the path parameter (id). The agent must guess how to construct the request.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and the resource 'deal funnel status', and includes the HTTP method and path. It is specific enough to distinguish from sibling tools like 'weeek_update_a_deal' which updates deal fields generally. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from 'weeek_update_a_funnel_status' which might update a funnel status definition itself.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'weeek_update_a_deal' or 'weeek_update_a_funnel_status'. It does not specify prerequisites, context, or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.