Create task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must fully convey behavioral traits. It only states 'POST /tm/tasks. Create task. Body: application/json.' This lacks details on side effects, required parameters (e.g., 'locations' is required but not mentioned), error handling, or return values. Minimal transparency for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence). While brevity is good, it sacrifices necessary detail. It is front-loaded with the HTTP method and endpoint, but lacks sufficient information to be fully useful. Score reflects under-specification rather than efficient conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of the input schema (nested objects, required fields) and the large number of sibling tools, the description is very incomplete. No output schema exists, and the description fails to differentiate from similar tools or explain key parameters. Essential context is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds no explanation of parameters. The input schema is complex with nested objects (e.g., 'locations' requiring 'projectId' and 'boardColumnId'), yet the description provides no guidance on how to structure the body. The single parameter 'body' is not elaborated.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Create task' clearly, indicating the tool's action and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'weeek_add_a_task_to_a_project' or 'weeek_attach_a_new_task', which may also create tasks in different contexts. The purpose is clear but not unique.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or context. This leaves an AI agent without guidance on tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.