Delete tag
weeek_delete_tagDelete a tag by its ID. Removes the specified tag from your workspace.
Instructions
DELETE /ws/tags/{id}. Delete tag. Tags: Tags.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes |
weeek_delete_tagDelete a tag by its ID. Removes the specified tag from your workspace.
DELETE /ws/tags/{id}. Delete tag. Tags: Tags.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description bears full burden. It only states 'Delete tag' without disclosing behavioral traits such as irreversibility, permission requirements, or effects on associated data.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (3 sentences) but includes redundant information: 'Delete tag' and 'Tags: Tags' add little value. It is concise but not optimally structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no annotations, no output schema, and a single parameter lacking description, the description fails to provide essential context for correct invocation. It omits return values, side effects, and usage details.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the 'path.id' parameter. It only shows the path template without clarifying that 'id' is the tag identifier, leaving the agent uninformed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'Delete tag' and includes the HTTP method and path, clearly indicating the action and resource. However, it does not distinguish from sibling delete/detach tag tools, which may cause confusion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'weeek_detach_a_tag' or prerequisites. The description lacks explicit usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/maxwellviksna-stack/weeek-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server