Delete task
weeek_delete_taskRemoves a task from your workspace by its ID. Ideal for cleaning up completed or obsolete tasks.
Instructions
DELETE /tm/tasks/{id}. Delete task. Tags: Task.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes |
weeek_delete_taskRemoves a task from your workspace by its ID. Ideal for cleaning up completed or obsolete tasks.
DELETE /tm/tasks/{id}. Delete task. Tags: Task.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description lacks any behavioral disclosure. With no annotations, the description must inform about consequences, but it only states 'Delete task' without mentioning permanence, permissions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While short, the description is under-specified rather than concise. It provides minimal value and omits essential details, making it inefficient for an agent.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of the tool (delete operation, many siblings) and absence of output schema, the description is severely incomplete. The agent cannot safely or correctly invoke the tool without external knowledge.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description does not explain the only parameter (path.id), leaving ambiguity about its source or format. The schema defines it as string or number, but no context is added.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Delete task') and HTTP method, making the purpose evident. However, it does not differentiate from sibling delete tools like 'weeek_delete_project' or 'weeek_delete_board' beyond the resource type.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as conditions for deletion, prerequisites, or irretrievability. The agent receives no help in decision-making.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/maxwellviksna-stack/weeek-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server