Update the address

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present, so description must disclose behavioral traits. Only states 'update the address' without revealing if partial update is allowed, authorization needs, or side effects. Schema implies only the 'address' field can be updated, but this is not explicit in description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise but at the expense of necessary detail. The structure mixes technical API details (PUT, tags, content type) with the core action, which may distract an AI agent. Every sentence earns its place, but the content is insufficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 2 parameters, nested objects, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. Missing explanation of how to obtain organizationId/addressId, constraints on the address field, and what the response contains. Agent would need to infer too much from schema alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet description adds no meaning to parameters. The endpoint string hints at path parameters (organizationId, addressId) but does not explain them. Body parameter 'address' is left as a generic string with no semantic context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Describes updating an address via PUT, clearly identifying the resource and operation. The endpoint pattern in the description adds specificity. However, includes tangential details (HTTP method, tags) that don't enhance purpose clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like weeek_create_an_address or weeek_delete_the_address. No prerequisites or conditions for invocation are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.