Get a funnel
weeek_get_a_funnelRetrieve a specific CRM funnel by its ID to access its properties and details.
Instructions
GET /crm/funnels/{id}. Get a funnel. Tags: Funnels.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes |
weeek_get_a_funnelRetrieve a specific CRM funnel by its ID to access its properties and details.
GET /crm/funnels/{id}. Get a funnel. Tags: Funnels.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must fully convey behavior. It only states it's a GET request and retrieves a funnel, but omits any details about side effects, permissions, rate limits, or response characteristics.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short but includes redundant information (the path and the statement 'Get a funnel' are repetitive). It could be more efficient while remaining clear.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema and no description of what a funnel is or what fields are returned, the description lacks completeness. For a retrieval tool, it should specify the structure or content of the returned object.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 0% description coverage, and the description does not explain the 'id' parameter beyond being part of the URL path. The agent must infer that 'id' refers to a funnel ID from the context, which is insufficient.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Get a funnel' and includes the HTTP method and endpoint path. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'weeek_get_all_funnels' and 'weeek_get_a_funnel_status', indicating a specific retrieval operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when to use this vs. 'weeek_get_all_funnels'). There are no prerequisites or context about when to invoke it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/maxwellviksna-stack/weeek-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server