Create a custom field option

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description should disclose behavioral traits. It only states the HTTP method and content type, but does not mention authorization requirements, idempotency, side effects, or return values. The agent is left uninformed about critical behaviors.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short, but it sacrifices essential information. It front-loads a technical endpoint path rather than a clear statement of the tool's value. Every sentence is minimal, but the lack of depth makes it under-specified rather than concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of annotations and output schema, the description must be comprehensive. It fails to explain what a custom field option is, how the parameters fit together, or what the result of creation looks like. The tool is complex with nested objects, and the description leaves many gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to parameters. It does not explain the purpose of 'name' or 'color', nor the meaning of 'funnel_id' and 'custom_field_id'. The only extra detail is 'Body: application/json', which is not about semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('custom field option'). However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools with identical titles and similar purposes, such as weeek_create_a_custom_field_option and weeek_create_a_custom_field_option_2.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No prerequisites (e.g., existing funnel and custom field) are mentioned. The description lacks context for appropriate use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.