Update tag

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It only says 'Update tag.' without any details on whether updates are destructive, idempotent, or what permissions are needed. There is no mention of side effects on associated entities.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short, but this is under-specification rather than conciseness. It includes the HTTP method and path but no structured explanation. A concise description should be informative yet brief; this is merely brief.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and a single-line description, the tool is not contextually complete. It lacks information about return values, error handling, tag behavior, or any related concepts. Agents would be left guessing about the tool's usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage, meaning no parameter descriptions exist. The description adds no additional meaning about the parameters. The schema defines 'body.title' and 'body.color' but their purpose is not explained. The description fails to compensate for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Update tag.' which is a clear verb+resource pair. However, it does not distinguish this from sibling tools like 'weeek_create_tag' or 'weeek_delete_tag', and provides no context on what aspects of the tag can be updated. It is minimally adequate but lacks specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or prerequisites are mentioned. Siblings like 'weeek_create_tag' and 'weeek_delete_tag' have similar lack of guidance, but the description does nothing to help an agent choose.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.