Delete the email

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'Delete the email' without mentioning side effects, required permissions, reversibility, or related data impacts. Agents need more detail for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short but includes the HTTP method and path, which is useful. However, it could be more concise by omitting redundancy with the title, but overall it's efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, annotations, and parameter descriptions, the description is incomplete. It does not explain how to construct the request, what happens upon success, or error scenarios. A minimal delete operation still requires more context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description adds no explanation of the parameters. The path parameter with nested contactId and emailId is not described, leaving agents to guess their roles and formats.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Delete the email' and includes the HTTP path, clearly identifying the resource. However, it repeats the title without adding differentiation from sibling delete tools like weeek_delete_the_address or weeek_delete_the_phone, although the path specifies 'emails'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as weeek_update_the_email_2 or other delete tools. Agents are left to infer context from the resource path alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.