olist_separacao_pesquisa

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must itself disclose behavior. It does not mention whether this is a read-only operation, what it returns, pagination details, or any side effects. The description is effectively just a title and reference, offering no behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, which is generally positive, but it is under-specified. It consists of a brief phrase and endpoint reference, with no structured explanation of purpose or usage. It is not as empty as a pure tautology, but it lacks the substance expected of a well-rounded tool description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is quite incomplete. It does not explain what a successful search returns, how results are structured, or any constraints like date formats (though the schema covers some). The documentation link could help, but the description itself is not self-contained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add any additional parameter semantics beyond the schema, but it doesn't need to since the schema is thorough.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Pesquisar Separações' (Search Separations), which clearly identifies the verb (search) and resource (separations). It also references the API endpoint, which reinforces the tool's purpose. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling 'olist_separacao_obter', though the search-versus-get distinction is implicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool instead of alternatives like olist_separacao_obter or olist_separacao_alterar_situacao. It only gives an endpoint name and a documentation link, which is not usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.