olist_produto_incluir

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of disclosure. It does explicitly state 'Esta operação altera dados' and requires confirmar=true, which is useful. But it omits other behavioral aspects like permissions, side effects, or response format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the tool's purpose, endpoint, and critical mutation warning. The documentation URL adds value, though it could be considered non-essential; overall it is efficient with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The produto parameter is an opaque nested object with no structured properties, and there is no output schema. The description does not explain how to build the payload or what the operation returns, relying instead on an external documentation link. This is insufficient for a mutating tool with an undefined nested object.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and both parameters have basic descriptions, so baseline 3 applies. The description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond the confirmar=true requirement already present in the schema, and the 'produto' object remains vaguely defined as 'conforme layout'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the operation as 'Incluir Produto' (include product) and names the API 2.0 endpoint, which distinguishes it from sibling tools like alterar/obter. However, it does not explicitly contrast it with olist_produto_alterar or state 'create a new product' in plain terms.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as olist_produto_alterar or olist_produtos_pesquisa. The description only mentions the endpoint and a mutation warning, leaving the agent to infer the use case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.