olist_expedicao_liberar_objetos

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must disclose behavioral effects. It only states the action without mentioning side effects (e.g., status changes), required permissions, or reversibility, leaving the agent without awareness of consequences.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and front-loaded with the primary purpose. It includes useful endpoint and documentation references without unnecessary prose, though the endpoint is partially redundant with the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

As a mutation tool with no annotations or output schema, the description fails to explain behavioral outcomes, prerequisites, or return values. The provided documentation link helps but does not substitute for an inline behavioral summary.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides 100% parameter coverage, describing idObjetos and tipoObjetos clearly. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Enviar objetos para a expedição' (send objects to expedition), identifying a specific verb and resource. It also provides the API endpoint. However, it does not explicitly differentiate this from sibling expedition tools, though the action of 'liberar' (releasing) is distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description simply states the action and endpoint without mentioning prerequisites, use cases, or excluded scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.