olist_crm_incluir_acao_assunto

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It states the operation alters data and requires confirmar=true, but this is redundant with the schema's confirmar parameter description ('operação mutável'). No additional behavioral context like side effects, permissions, or response behavior is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with three sentences, front-loading the purpose and endpoint. The documentation link is useful, though the title and endpoint are somewhat repetitive. Overall, it is efficient and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description must provide complete context. It fails to explain the structure of 'acao', how to obtain valid values, what the response looks like, or how this tool fits with related CRM operations. The documentation link is helpful but does not compensate for the lack of inline detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both 'acao' and 'confirmar' already described clearly. The tool description adds no further meaning beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Incluir Ação no Assunto do CRM' (Include Action in CRM Subject) and provides the API endpoint, clearly identifying the action and resource. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like olist_crm_incluir_assunto by specifying this is for adding an action to a subject.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as olist_crm_incluir_assunto or olist_crm_alterar_situacao_acao. The mention of 'altera dados e exige confirmar=true' is a prerequisite for execution rather than a usage scenario, and no exclusions or alternative conditions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.