olist_produto_obter_estrutura

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, leaving the description as the sole source of behavioral context. The description mentions API 2.0 and an endpoint but does not disclose what the structure contains, whether it is read-only (though 'obter' implies retrieval), or any quirks. The documentation link is a pointer, not actual disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and front-loaded with the purpose, but it is fragmented into three short segments (name, endpoint, documentation link). It is not overly verbose, though the endpoint string repeats the tool name and the doc link may not add immediate value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description should explain what the product structure is, what the response looks like, or when to use this tool. It provides none of that, leaving the agent without essential context beyond the tool's name.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter 'id' with a clear description ('Número de identificação do produto na Olist'), so schema coverage is 100%. The description does not add any additional meaning to the parameter, but the schema already provides sufficient information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Obter Estrutura do Produto' (Get Product Structure), which is a specific verb+resource combination. It also names the API endpoint, but it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'olist_produto_obter' which also retrieves product data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description only restates the tool's name and provides a documentation link, with no context about use cases, exclusions, or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.