olist_produto_atualizar_estoque

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the safety burden and does state 'Esta operação altera dados e exige confirmar=true', warning the agent about mutation and confirmation requirement. However, it does not mention consequences, reversibility, auth needs, or response behavior, so transparency is only partial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with purpose, followed by endpoint and docs link, ending with a mutation warning. Every sentence adds some context, though the endpoint string duplicates the tool name's semantics.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has a nested 'estoque' object with no concrete fields, no output schema, and no annotations, so the description should provide more operational scaffolding. It includes a documentation link and confirmation requirement, but without knowing the stock layout or return behavior, an agent may struggle to invoke it autonomously.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers both parameters with descriptions, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no further parameter meaning beyond echoing 'confirmar=true'; the 'estoque' parameter's layout remains vague ('conforme layout'), so the agent must rely on external docs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Atualizar estoque do produto API 2.0', clearly identifying the action (update stock) and resource (product). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like olist_produto_obter_estoque and olist_produto_atualizar_precos, though it does not explicitly name alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no explicit when-to-use guidance or alternatives; it only states that the operation changes data and requires confirmar=true. The purpose statement implies usage for updating product stock, but there is no contrast with get-stock or other product mutation tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.