olist_crm_incluir_assunto

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the operation 'altera dados' (changes data) and requires confirmar=true, but this is largely redundant with the schema's confirmar parameter description ('operação mutável'). No additional behavioral context is provided, such as side effects, reversibility, permissions, or expected response.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the tool's purpose. The inclusion of the endpoint and docs link is useful, though the endpoint line slightly duplicates the tool name. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple mutation tool with 2 fully described parameters and a docs link, the description is minimally sufficient. However, it lacks any explanation of what 'assunto' represents, the expected return format, or error behavior. The docs link mitigates but does not replace this missing context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for both parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description adds nothing about the parameters themselves; it only references the endpoint and mutation requirement, which does not compensate or enhance parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the operation verb 'Incluir' (include) and resource 'Assunto' (subject), plus the endpoint 'crm.incluir.assunto' and a docs link. This clearly indicates a CRM subject creation tool, though it does not explicitly differentiate it from sibling tools like olist_crm_incluir_acao_assunto.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It only states that it alters data and requires confirmar=true, without any contextual markers such as 'use this to create a new CRM subject' or 'if you need to...'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.