olist_expedicao_incluir_agrupamento

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of disclosing behavior. It explicitly states that the operation alters data and requires confirmar=true, which is important mutation context. However, it does not explain side effects, reversibility, permissions, or error behavior, so transparency is only partial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded with the core purpose, followed by endpoint and documentation links. Every sentence adds useful information, though the URL is long and could be considered slightly heavy for a tool description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple 2-parameter schema and no output schema, the description provides adequate context: purpose, endpoint, documentation link, and a mutation warning. It is reasonably complete for an agent to invoke the tool safely, especially with the confirmar=true requirement clearly stated.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already provides detailed meanings for idsExpedicao and confirmar. The description adds little beyond restating the confirmar=true requirement, so it neither improves nor harms parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific action ('Incluir agrupamento de expedições') and identifies the exact API endpoint, making the tool's purpose clear. It distinguishes itself from sibling expedition tools through the verb 'incluir' versus 'pesquisar', 'concluir', and 'obter', though it does not explicitly contrast them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like olist_expedicao_pesquisar_agrupamentos or olist_expedicao_concluir_agrupamento. It warns that the operation mutates data and requires confirmar=true, but does not state prerequisites, exclusions, or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.