list_game_vehicles

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden, yet it never states that this is a non-destructive read, whether results reflect live game state, or how results are ordered. It only discloses scope (the player's vehicles folder) and the optional substring filter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight sentence with no filler. It leads with the resource rather than the action, which is a minor front-loading weakness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be explained, and the tool is a simple single-parameter list. Still, absent annotations, the description should say something about read-only semantics and result behavior to be complete for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate; it does explain that 'search' acts as an optional substring filter. However, it omits details like case sensitivity or matching fields, so it only partially fills the gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

It names a specific resource (vehicles in the player's Stormworks vehicles folder) and its filtering behavior, so an agent can tell what data comes back. The verb is only implied via the name, and no sibling (e.g. list_designs) is explicitly contrasted, so it falls short of 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this over list_designs or the other list_* siblings, and no prerequisites or exclusions are given. Usage is only inferable from the name and description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.