Skip to main content
Glama
macery12

Stormworks MCP

by macery12
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Stormworks MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • SolidWorks MCP Server

      Sam-Of-The-Arth
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to create and manipulate SolidWorks CAD models through natural language commands, automating part creation, sketching, and extrusion.
      10
      -

    • SolidWorks MCP Server

      906grown
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to control SolidWorks through natural language, supporting part and assembly creation, sketches, advanced features, dimension editing, selection inspection, screenshots, and rebuilds.
      MIT

    • freecad-print-mcp

      drmarcelofrodrigues-ctrl
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to model 3D-printable parts by running Python scripts in a headless FreeCAD instance and exporting STL/3MF/STEP files. It also lets Claude visually inspect renders, check mesh integrity and overhang printability, measure volume and estimated mass, and open results in a slicer before printing.
      10
      MIT

    • SolidWorks MCP Server

      TanPhan97
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to drive SolidWorks in natural language, creating parts and assemblies, sketching and modeling features, editing dimensions, setting materials, and exporting CAD files. It also exposes selection, mass-property, and viewport-capture tools so 3D designs can be built and verified conversationally.
      MIT

    • onshape-cad MCP server

      Checkmate321
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to create and modify real, editable Onshape CAD models through the Onshape REST API, covering parametric sketches, solid features, configurations, assemblies with mates and motion tests, interference checks, FeatureScript custom features, versions/branches, and import/export.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 49 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The descriptions go to great lengths to cross-reference each other (e.g. 'boats use hull_design_guide instead', 'wires use edit_connections'), which helps, but the surface has many near-siblings: preview_hull vs preview_vehicle vs preview_game_vehicle vs preview_interior vs preview_vehicle_diagnostics, and analyze_vehicle vs analyze_land_vehicle vs analyze_hull vs study_references. An agent must carefully parse long prose to pick correctly, and similar tool names invite misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Almost all tools use a predictable verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_, get_, preview_, analyze_, search_, save_, edit_, query_, apply_, prepare_, record_, plan_, repair_, check_, open_, import_, find_, score_, study_, suggest_, undo_). A few noun-first outliers (hull_design_guide, land_vehicle_guide, deck_profile) are minor deviations but still readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 49 tools the surface is heavy even for a complex CAD-like domain, with many specialized variants (separate preview, analyze, guide, and save tools per resource type). Consolidation into parameterized tools would reduce the burden on an agent navigating this set.

    Completeness4/5

    The lifecycle is well covered: design from presets/specs, edit parts, wire/pipes, preflight and repair planning, validation runs, save, and analysis/scoring. Minor gaps exist (e.g. no delete/rename of stored drafts or saved vehicles), but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources