Dpanel Store Delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden. It does flag the operation as destructive and states the confirm=true safety gate, which is the most important behavioral context for a delete. However, it omits consequences (whether deployed apps referencing the source are affected), auth/permission requirements, and irreversibility details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence that pairs the action with its destructive nature and the confirm requirement. No filler, no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need no explanation, and the safety-relevant confirm gate is covered. But with no annotations and 0% parameter coverage, the missing description of 'id' and of what happens to dependents of the deleted source leaves gaps for a destructive tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It clarifies that confirm acts as a required safety flag for this destructive operation (beyond the schema's default=false), which adds real meaning, but the required 'id' parameter is left completely undefined in both schema and description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource ('删除应用商店源' / delete app store source), so an agent can tell it apart from dpanel_store_list, dpanel_store_sync, dpanel_store_deploy and dpanel_store_create by the delete action alone. It does not explicitly differentiate itself from siblings, but the purpose is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and no alternatives are named. The only hint is the confirm=true prerequisite, which is a usage constraint but not routing guidance against the many other delete/prune siblings in this namespace.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.