Dpanel Store Create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet it only implies a mutation. It says nothing about permissions required, whether duplicate names are rejected, whether the source is validated against the url before persisting, or any confirmation/rollback behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with no padding or wasted words, front-loading the action. It is concise, but the brevity is achieved through under-specification rather than efficient communication.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need not be explained. However, a mutation tool with five fully undocumented required parameters and no annotations leaves an agent without enough context to construct a valid call, which the description should have compensated for.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Five required parameters (name, title, store_type, url, apps) at 0% schema description coverage, and the description supplies zero information about any of them. An agent cannot tell what store_type values are valid or what shape each element of apps must take.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 添加(add) + 应用商店源(app store source). An agent can distinguish it from dpanel_store_list, dpanel_store_sync, dpanel_store_deploy, and dpanel_store_delete by the create verb, though the description does not name those siblings or clarify the scope of what a 'store source' is.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No indication of when to use this tool versus the other store tools, no prerequisites, and no mention of what identifying information is needed. Only the implied create-vs-other-CRUD reading from the name provides any guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.