Dpanel Env Detail

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, yet it discloses nothing about read-only nature, required permissions, error behavior, or what happens for a missing environment. It is a bare restatement of the title.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short sentence with no wasted words, but it is under-specified rather than concise — brevity here costs the agent needed information instead of earning its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, which relieves the description of explaining return values, but with no annotations and 0% parameter coverage the definition leaves the agent without the environment-scoping or name-format context needed for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the single required 'name' parameter. The description does not clarify whether 'name' is an environment name, ID, or slug, nor its format. Only the tool name weakly implies the parameter refers to an environment identifier.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description "Docker 环境详情" essentially restates the tool title (Dpanel Env Detail) and its name (dpanel_env_detail). It implies a read of environment details but names no distinguishing scope or verb beyond what the name already conveys, and gives no contrast with siblings like dpanel_env_list or dpanel_env_switch.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus the other env tools (dpanel_env_list, dpanel_env_switch, dpanel_env_create, dpanel_env_delete). No prerequisites, exclusions, or alternative routes are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.