Dpanel Cron Log List

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden, yet it discloses nothing about read-only vs mutating behavior, pagination, ordering, result limits, or required permissions. It is silent on every behavioral trait an agent would need.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

It is a single short sentence, but that brevity reflects under-specification rather than conciseness. Nothing is front-loaded or elaborated because nothing of substance is said.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although an output schema exists (so return values needn't be described), the definition omits the one thing that matters: what the required 'id' identifies and what the tool does with it. For a required-parameter lookup tool, this is inadequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is one required parameter, 'id', with 0% schema description coverage, and the description says nothing about it. Whether it is a cron job id or a log entry id, and its format, is entirely unstated, so the description fails to compensate for the coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '计划任务执行日志。' essentially restates the tool name/title (Cron Log List) without adding a verb or scope. It tells the agent the resource is a scheduled-task execution log but not that the tool lists or retrieves those logs, nor how it differs from dpanel_cron_list, dpanel_log_list, or dpanel_cron_prune_log.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no mention of any alternative tool. With siblings like dpanel_cron_list and dpanel_log_list in the set, the agent is given nothing to disambiguate when this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.